There is much debate both here in the US and in Guatemala as to the issue of the thousands of babies being adopted each year. While many are supportive of the individuals adopting the children and there is no doubt that most of these children will experience much better living condition, the debate rages as to whether the situation has gotten out of hand and as some opponents have been quoted “become an export industry.”
While I definitely believe that the situation needs to be carefully monitored for the best interest of the children, I think most know where my opinion lies. That being said, I think it is important to know all sides of the issues at hand.
On July 30th, The Seattle Times ran an article specifically on the issue of adoption from Guatemala. Take a look and comment below on your take on what you read.
Debate rages on over Guatemala’s adoption industry
By Juan Carlos Llorca
The Associated PressGUATEMALA CITY — Every 100th baby born in Guatemala grows up as an adopted American, making the Central American country the richest source of adoptees in the Western Hemisphere. But U.S. ratification of an international adoption treaty is likely to choke off the supply next summer.
Critics say Guatemala has become a baby farm where adoptions are too easy and prone to corruption. Defenders say it offers the children a better future, and that legal corners are cut only to spare Guatemalan women the stigma of unwed motherhood or relieve them of another mouth to feed.
For now, willing parents can get Guatemalan babies by paying thousands of dollars to notaries who act as baby brokers, recruiting birth mothers, handling all the paperwork and completing the job in less than half the time it takes elsewhere. The process is so streamlined that Guatemala outpaces all other countries in the percentage of its children put up for U.S. adoption.
All this will likely end once the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoptions takes effect in the United States. The U.S. will then require all foreign adoptions to meet tougher international standards, which Guatemala ratified in 2003 but has yet to implement.
“We don’t want adoptions to stop, but we believe the current system does not provide enough protection to the child’s needs,” said John Lowell, the U.S. consul in Guatemala.
The treaty, also ratified by China, Russia and at least 39 other countries, aims to protect children, birth parents and adoptive parents from abuse, in part by requiring a government agency to regulate adoptions.
Guatemala still allows adoptions to be managed privately, without judicial approval. In many other countries, adoptions take more than a year. Guatemala can deliver children in as little as five months.
Berta Morales, 35, has given the last five of her 10 children to Americans.
“It would have been more of a sin to abort them,” said Morales, who lives west of Guatemala City. “I’m poor … but maybe one of them will become a professional.”
Morales said she was paid only bus fare to Guatemala City, the capital, to sign the papers. But Josefina Arellano, who directs the government office that approves each adoption, says women who give up multiple children in a row are probably getting paid.
“When you look at the time between pregnancies and how many children they have given up, you have to conclude they are doing it for money,” she says. “What we’re witnessing is a baby factory or farm, dealing with children that should not have been born or put up for adoption.”
Susana Luarca, a notaries association lawyer, denied mothers are doing it for money: “What more help could they get,” she asks, “than relieving them of the problem of their child’s situation?”
Every profession has unscrupulous people, “but that does not mean everything is rotten,” added Luarca, who is handling 40 adoptions. “Some people have tried to make the case that just because a business is lucrative, it’s bad.”
Notaries charge a “country fee” of up to $19,000. With U.S. paperwork and plane trips, the typical Guatemalan adoption costs as much as $30,000, adoption agencies say.
But in the last six months alone, the government has brought 30 criminal cases against notaries over falsifying paperwork, allegedly providing false birth certificates and even creating false identities to avoid having to involve the birth father or the parents of underage birth mothers.
Applications are surging as parents rush to take advantage of the current process, which will apply to any request filed before the treaty takes effect in mid-2007.
Defenders say most adoptees are delivered from poverty into loving homes. “There are opportunities that a child could have in education, exposure to cultures, resources that they may not otherwise have had,” said Megan Hendy, who directs the Joint Council for International Children Services, representing more than 200 international adoption agencies in 51 countries.
With half of Guatemala’s 13 million people living in poverty, many families struggle to provide for their children. Newspaper and radio ads appeal to women with unwanted pregnancies to consider adoption, and notaries hire people to find birth mothers to meet the demand.
“They’re like scouts in charge of looking for young pregnant women,” Arellano said.
Mothers typically hand over their babies to foster parents working for a notary.
Copyright © 2006 The Seattle Times Company
This Article can be found by clicking here
As the world’s attention begins to focus more and more on Central America, many questions will be raised regarding these issues. What do you think about this article and these points of view?

e-mail











The reason we chose to adopt from Guatemala is because it is a better situation there for the child while they are waiting to be adopoted. Nobody every talks about the thousands of children being adopted from China were the children are raised in orphanages given no opportunity to attach to a caregiver in that critical time of their life. Their adoptive parents do not bring them home until they are about 18 months of age. I wanted my child to come home at around 6 months so that they have a better chance of adjusting to me. Once the laws are changed in Guatemala it will be just like the China program. Babies will be in orphanages and for longer amounts of time. It makes me angry when people say that the system works for lawyers and parents when really it should be what is best for the child.
I really have to think that it has to be better for an infant to be in a foster home in Guatemala than in an orphanage. I’m not saying the caregivers in orphanages don’t care about the babies, but the family-like environment that fosters and teaches attachment is huge in my mind. We didn’t adopt from Guatemala, but we at one time were in the process. Anyway, what I think doesn’t matter. The US ratified the Hague, and that’s how it is.