Guatemala Adoption Blog

10/04/07

Bill 3217 (The Ortega Law) and Bill 3635

Posted by : Lisa in Guatemala Adoption Blog at 09:51 am , 437 words, 485 views  
Categories: *Guatemalan Adoption News


Continued from here.

Bill 3217, also known as the Ortega Law, is the “baby” of UNICEF, the US DOS, The Hague Conference and President Oscar Berger and his wife Wendy. Originally it had a grandfather clause and allowed the notarial process, however last month the Hague Conference’s team of “experts” (and I use that term loosely) introduced many amendments that eliminated the grandfather clause, the notarial process, the relinquishment by the parents, and foster care for children. This would be a complete disaster for the children who would have to wait for years before they can be adopted. With the orphanges in Guatemala already full and the government not making any effort to prepare homes and services for these children, their futures are horribly bleak. I would also like to remind my readers that Guatemala will receive 28 million dollars from UNICEF if they implement this bill. As I mentioned in my previous blog, next week an amendment to grandfather adoptions in process will be introduced in the Guatemalan congress.

SPONSOR

Susana Luarca of the ADA writes this about the Ortega Law:

We believe that the key to improve the Guatemalan adoption legal system is not to impose a treaty that not only Guatemala cannot legally become a party to, but that has proven to produce the exact opposite effect of what it should. Instead of protecting the children and their families in an adoption process, it makes adoption something so difficult that they are reduced to a few, while the number of aborted, mistreated, abandoned and abused children increase tremendously.

A second proposal, Bill 3635, was put forth by the Guatemalan congress. One major downside is that it makes the relinquishing process very difficult for the birth mothers. Only after interviews with psychologists, social workers, and a member of the central authority as well as a judge are they able to put their child up for adoption. In addition, it will be harder for singles to adopt. However, this proposal doesn’t appoint PGN, the Secretary of Social Welfare or the office of the wife of the president as the central authority over adoption.

As explained by Susana Luarca:

“The central authority would be an autonomous entity, whose board of directors would be seven delegates of the following: one for each of the three powers, one for the PGN, one for the Secretary of Social Welfare, one for the Human Rights Office, one for the Guatemalan Bar Association and one for the Guatemalan Medical Association.”

Amendments can be made to tweak this bill, but it appears that it is going to fall by the wayside.

Photo credit: Google Images

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
What a disaster.

One of the gang of anti-adoption bloggers has been referring to the present situation in Guatemala as a 'train wreck'. I've suggested it's much more like a terrorist attack, and with UNICEF paying bribe money, that over-inflated gas bag of an organization has to be considered part of the attack force.

Those who've been concerned about bribery and coercion in adoptions should be taking note of this mother of all bribes. The Bergers will have themselves a nice little retirement package, though.

Pity the Guatemalan children, folks. They're being hung out to dry. I would so love to see some of these people working so hard to end adoption in the country have to answer to the children someday.
PermalinkPermalink 10/04/07 @ 09:34
Comment from: Chromesthesia [Member] Email
Singles to adopt? This is ridiculous.
What can be DONE about this?
Ending international adoption didn't do much good for Romania and Cambodia, so why are they trying this in Guatemala? I really don't understand.
PermalinkPermalink 10/04/07 @ 11:25
Comment from: emory77 [Member] Email · http://www.bullcityemorys.blogspot.com
I thought 3635 had a fighting chance at one point. I agree with Sandra-this is a disaster.

good job on bringing us the news, btw!!!
PermalinkPermalink 10/04/07 @ 11:45
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
It's a disaster, for sure. BTW, has anyone ever seen a SINGLE anti-adoption person go to downtown Guatemala, any street, sit down next to a filthy, hungry toddler eating dirt clumps by the side of the road and say "I just KNOW that preventing your adoption is going to benefit not just you but all other other homeless and hopeless children in this country". No? Gosh, I can't imagine why not.......

Happy retirement Sr. and Sra. Berger. It'll be a grand one earned on the backs of the homeless children of your country.....
PermalinkPermalink 10/04/07 @ 17:16
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

   

Misc

Subscribe to Guatemala Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • epibet80
  • Guest Users: 189